44.12%
Passenger vehicle — Mazda 6
- 10.32 → 5.76 L/100km
- Real-world driving, matched route
Source: Queensland Emission Testers

Real vehicles. Real equipment. Real results.
Proven results across different engines, different applications and real-world conditions — independent fuel consumption testing on passenger vehicles, SUVs and industrial generators.
44.12%
Source: Queensland Emission Testers
59%
Source: Independent test (Queensland)
64.62%
Source: Independent test data
Mazda 6GT (Diesel 2.2L) — Brisbane & Northern NSW, 15–18 March 2014
| Trial | Date | Before (L/100km) | After (L/100km) | Route | Method | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial 1 | March 2014 | 10.32 | 5.75 | Route 1 | Fill-to-fill | 44.28% |
| Trial 2 | March 2014 | 10.32 | 5.79 | Route 1 | Fill-to-fill | 43.90% |
| Trial 3 | March 2014 | 10.32 | 5.74 | Route 2 | Fill-to-fill | 44.38% |
| Trial 4 | March 2014 | 10.32 | 5.77 | Route 2 | Fill-to-fill | 44.09% |
Four road trials across two route profiles produced route averages of 44.01% and 44.24%, and a total average of 44.12%. Fill-to-fill results were independently supervised by Steve Eccles, Certified ADR Compliance Tester.
Independent validation & testing context
Tests were conducted under consistent, real-world driving conditions with live vehicle load, standardised driving protocols and documented fuel-measurement procedures.
The Mazda 6 testing was supervised and the results verified at each stage by Mr Steve Eccles, Australian Government Inspector, for ADR compliance and accuracy of the fuel-consumption testing. Signed ADR compliance documentation was issued following completion of the diesel and petrol tests.
A real-world road test and an Australian ADR laboratory/bench test should not be treated as directly equivalent methodologies. ADR testing is conducted under prescribed, controlled conditions for regulatory assessment; the EX10D Mazda testing evaluated vehicle behaviour on actual roads, under live load and real operating conditions.
For EX10D fleet validation, the real-world results provide complementary operational evidence rather than a substitute for ADR certification testing.
Read the source
Real conversations. Real impact.